Oscar Wilde’s Preface to The Picture of Dorian Gray considers the
logic of aesthetic philosophy. Aesthetic philosophy is the idea that beauty,
particularly art, should be embraced in every way. Wilde believes that the
purpose of art is to be beautiful, and “To reveal art and conceal the artist is
art’s aim” (Wilde vii). Art does not reflect the artist; instead, art should be
as distant from the reality of the artist’s life as possible. Reality seems to
be the antithesis of art. Wilde further tries to distance art and reality,
saying, “Art is at once surface and symbol. Those who go beneath the surface do
so at their peril. Those who read the symbol do so at their peril” (vii). One
loses his appreciation for the beauty of art when he tries to connect it to
life. However, art does symbolically represent something, for it “is at once […]
symbol.” In the end, Wilde concludes, “All art is quite useless” (viii). Something
that is useful cannot be art, and therefore cannot be beautiful. Something is
only beautiful if the only function it serves is to be beautiful. There is a
paradoxical nature to his description of this philosophy, for art seems to
serve a purpose even if the only purpose it serves is to represent beauty.
Wilde’s tone toward his audience is
somewhat playful but simultaneously superior as he describes the nature of art
in the Preface. Wilde seems to enjoy the idea of ensnaring the reader into his
paradoxical mind traps. He has no qualms about proposing rather unconventional ideas,
such as “There is no such thing as a moral or an immoral book. Books are well
written, or badly written. That is all” (vii). Some readers are sure to
disagree with not only his statement but also the manner in which he expresses
it. Often people consider the primary function of books to be some example or
explanation of morality. To further frustrate the reader, Wilde does not defend
his claim. He just leaves his statement and moves on. The reader wants him to
justify it so that there is something to contradict or grasp onto. Instead,
Wilde leaves the readers to figure out his logic, forcing them to generate his
own idea. The use of “That is all” just adds to the superiority of his tone. He
seems to be toying with the reader as he identifies paradoxes within society.
For instance, he comments, “The nineteenth century dislike of Realism is the
rage of Caliban seeing his own face in a glass. The nineteenth century dislike
of Romanticism is the rage of Caliban not seeing his own face in a glass” (vii).
People dislike the fact that Realism shows harsh and sometimes ugly reality,
yet they dislike that Romanticism ignores the true nature of things. Wilde does
not equivocate in his writing; he is very straightforward with his ideas even
if these ideas are difficult for the reader to understand.
No comments:
Post a Comment