How Everyone in Hamlet Would Benefit From a Family Chat
Lack
of communication and honesty threatens to continue causing problems for Hamlet
and those around him. Rather than make assumptions about what others are
thinking, each character should take it upon himself to directly address the issues
at hand. For instance, Claudius and Gertrude should perhaps take initiative
with Hamlet and explain their actions. The King seems to display profound concern
for Hamlet when he asks Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to essentially spy on him,
commenting, “What should it be, / More than his father’s death, that thus hath
put him / So much from th’ understanding of himself / I cannot dream of”
(2.2.7-10). Perhaps if the King had put a little more thought into the
situation, he may have realized that his nephew-son feels a little confused and
angry about the relationship between his “uncle-father and aunt-mother” (2.2.399).
Hamlet is bound to make assumptions (as he already has), and if those
assumptions lead him to believe that Claudius murdered his father (which they
have), then everyone may benefit from some clarification about the events
leading to King Hamlet’s death. Even if Claudius did murder Hamlet’s father,
admitting the truth now will save him from the repercussions of allowing the idea
to fester and twist itself in Hamlet’s mind. At the same time, Hamlet also needs
to take on some responsibility and approach Claudius with his concerns. Acting crazy
has thus far served no other purpose than to convince Polonius that Hamlet is madly
in love with Ophelia. Through his deception, Hamlet is perpetuating the spread
of false interpretations of his actions which is ironic given his supposed
contempt for fake appearances. Indeed, Hamlet is disgusted with himself when he
realizes that the actor conveyed deeper emotions than he has been able to
express in response to his father’s supposed murder. Rather than try to
directly address the problem, however, Hamlet decides to “have these players /
Play something like the murder of [his] father / Before [his] uncle”
(2.2.623-5). He believes that observing his uncle at the play will provide more
conclusive evidence than just the ghost who may, Hamlet admits, be a devil
playing on his emotions. Unfortunately, appearances can be deceiving, so Hamlet’s
plan may result in another misunderstanding. Only honesty and communication can
help avoid tragedy.
An example of a heart-to-heart
chat circumventing some problems:
“Hey Hamlet, you seem to be
acting a bit crazy lately. Is there anything particularly bothering you that I
can help clear up?”
“Actually uncle-king-dad, there
is. See, the ghost of my father came and told me that you poisoned him, stole
his wife, and took the throne. It’s been bothering me a bit lately.”
“Well Hamlet, I must admit that
this is an unforeseen problem. I wasn’t banking on Hamlet coming back from the
grave. However, the answer is yes, I did in fact murder your dad. I understand
that you are probably a bit angry right now.”
“Yeah, I’m pretty upset.
However, I appreciate your honesty. Now I know that if I kill you, I won’t find
out later that there was some miscommunication.”
“Yes. However, you should also
consider whether the ghost was your dead father or the devil. It may make a
difference to you if you are seeking to avoid eternal damnation.”
“That’s a good point. Thanks, I’ll
keep that in mind.”
“No problem. I think these chats
are good for us. Provided that you decide not to murder me anytime soon, I
think we should make this a regular thing.”
Unfortunately, this would not
make for a good Shakespearean tragedy.
No comments:
Post a Comment