Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Dorian Gray #1



            Oscar Wilde develops intriguing relationships between three of his characters at the beginning of The Picture of Dorian Gray. Wilde begins by introducing Basil Hallward, an artist, and his friend Lord Henry Wotton. They seem to understand each other and have a well-established relationship. Harry says some rather offensive things, but Basil does not pay them any mind. Following Harry’s discourse on the immorality of both the upper and lower classes, Basil responds, “I don’t agree with a single word that you’ve said, and, what is more, Harry, I feel sure you don’t either” (Wilde 7). Based on Basil’s reactions, Harry is not as immoral and heartless as he presents himself to be. If the reader is to trust Basil’s interpretation, Harry merely spews controversial ideas to get people to react to him. Harry and Basil appear to have a comfortable relationship in which they balance each other out.
            Dorian Gray adds another dynamic to Basil and Harry’s friendship. Both men have some sort of strong feelings for Dorian. Basil meets Dorian at a party and immediately feels a connection to him. Dorian becomes the subject of Basil’s portrait, a portrait so personal that Basil refuses to show it to the public. When asked how often he sees Dorian, Basil replies, “Every day. I couldn’t be happy if I didn’t see him every day. He is absolutely necessary to me” (7). Basil is reluctant to allow Harry to meet him, yet when Dorian asks Harry to stay, Basil requests the same in order to please him. There is a possessive quality to their relationship; Basil wants Dorian all to himself. Harry is likewise fascinated by Dorian, and he decides to advise Dorian to just live to serve himself and stop resisting temptations. Dorian finds himself captivated by the idea. Harry “felt intensely interested. He was amazed at the sudden impression that his words had produced […] He had merely shot an arrow into the air. Had it hit the mark? How fascinating the lad was!” (14). Harry’s thoughts support Basil’s belief that Harry enjoys being controversial for the sake of being provocative. He seems to have some desire to influence Dorian, and this wish may cause some division in his relationship with Basil. Already he is stealing Dorian away, and Basil may come to resent him for it.   

Monday, November 12, 2012

Dorian Gray Preface



Oscar Wilde’s Preface to The Picture of Dorian Gray considers the logic of aesthetic philosophy. Aesthetic philosophy is the idea that beauty, particularly art, should be embraced in every way. Wilde believes that the purpose of art is to be beautiful, and “To reveal art and conceal the artist is art’s aim” (Wilde vii). Art does not reflect the artist; instead, art should be as distant from the reality of the artist’s life as possible. Reality seems to be the antithesis of art. Wilde further tries to distance art and reality, saying, “Art is at once surface and symbol. Those who go beneath the surface do so at their peril. Those who read the symbol do so at their peril” (vii). One loses his appreciation for the beauty of art when he tries to connect it to life. However, art does symbolically represent something, for it “is at once […] symbol.” In the end, Wilde concludes, “All art is quite useless” (viii). Something that is useful cannot be art, and therefore cannot be beautiful. Something is only beautiful if the only function it serves is to be beautiful. There is a paradoxical nature to his description of this philosophy, for art seems to serve a purpose even if the only purpose it serves is to represent beauty.
Wilde’s tone toward his audience is somewhat playful but simultaneously superior as he describes the nature of art in the Preface. Wilde seems to enjoy the idea of ensnaring the reader into his paradoxical mind traps. He has no qualms about proposing rather unconventional ideas, such as “There is no such thing as a moral or an immoral book. Books are well written, or badly written. That is all” (vii). Some readers are sure to disagree with not only his statement but also the manner in which he expresses it. Often people consider the primary function of books to be some example or explanation of morality. To further frustrate the reader, Wilde does not defend his claim. He just leaves his statement and moves on. The reader wants him to justify it so that there is something to contradict or grasp onto. Instead, Wilde leaves the readers to figure out his logic, forcing them to generate his own idea. The use of “That is all” just adds to the superiority of his tone. He seems to be toying with the reader as he identifies paradoxes within society. For instance, he comments, “The nineteenth century dislike of Realism is the rage of Caliban seeing his own face in a glass. The nineteenth century dislike of Romanticism is the rage of Caliban not seeing his own face in a glass” (vii). People dislike the fact that Realism shows harsh and sometimes ugly reality, yet they dislike that Romanticism ignores the true nature of things. Wilde does not equivocate in his writing; he is very straightforward with his ideas even if these ideas are difficult for the reader to understand.      

Sunday, November 4, 2012

"The Chimney Sweeper"



Thesis: William Blake relies on a rhythmical structure and an allegorical anecdote to add to the irony in “The Chimney Sweeper,” hoping to elicit an indignant response from the reader at the unjust working conditions of the young chimney sweepers.

The positive, almost playful structure of the poem starkly contrasts the dismal and submissive lifestyle being described, creating an unnatural feeling for the reader.


  • The poem begins with the boy describing his past: “When my mother died I was very young, / And my father sold me while yet my tongue / Could scarcely cry” (lines 1-3). The entire poem is written in rhyming couplets, and the format is similar to a folk ballad. This positive rhythmical structure seems unnatural given the depressing circumstances of the boy’s life.

  • The boy explains the result of being sold to the chimney sweepers, saying, “So your chimneys I sweep, and in soot I sleep” (line 4). The alliteration of the soothing “s” sound contrasts with the lifestyle the boy is describing. The reader feels uncomfortable because the tone is so matter-of-fact; based on the imagery in the poem, the diction should be harsh and depressing. To make it even more uncomfortable, the boy addresses the reader by referring to “your chimneys.” The author makes the reader feel responsible and accountable for the conditions the boy is living in.


Blake uses an allegory to represent the discrepancy between the carefree enjoyment of life that a young boy should experience and the preoccupation with death that Tom deals with.

  • The other boys in Tom’s dream “Were all of them locked up in coffins of black” (line 12). The black coffins are clearly associated with death. Perhaps being a chimney sweeper is like a living death for these boys, or perhaps Tom actually knows people who have died doing this job. Either way, the boys are trapped doing this work and have no freedom. It is an awful way of life.

  • In the dream, “the Angel told Tom, if he’d be a good boy, / He’d have God for his father, and never want joy” (lines 19-20). The dream shows that Tom hopes for the possibility of a better life. However, it seems as though Tom must wait until death to experience love and joy. A young boy should not have to feel that this is the case.


The irony in the poem ensures that the reader recognizes and responds to the contrast between the safe and comfortable atmosphere that a young boy should be raised in and the frightening conditions that the chimney sweepers experience.  
  • After his friend’s hair is shaved off, the speaker remembers consoling him, “Hush Tom! never mind it, for, when your head’s bare, / You know that the soot cannot spoil your white hair” (lines 7-8). The speaker’s logic is ironic because clearly Tom’s hair cannot be spoiled if he has no hair left. The reader notices the irony, forcing him to actually think about what has happened to Tom.  
  • Based on his dream, Tom believes that “if all do their duty they need not fear harm” (line 24). This ending line highlights the irony present throughout the poem. From all of the descriptions so far, it is clear that the boys are being harmed. However, although Tom recognizes that his life is not good, he does not completely understand that this is unjust. It is up to the reader to generate these feelings of anger about the awful conditions these boys are subjected to. 

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

1984 #9



WAR IS PEACE.

3 superstates


o   Eurasia--> Russia absorbed Europe --> now N. part of Europe/Asia landmass, Portugal to Bering Strait
o   Oceania--> USA absorbed British Empire -->now Americas, Atlantic Islands (incl British Isles), Australia, S. Africa
o   Eastasia--> 10 yrs fighting --> now China, countries S., Japanese islands, portion of Manchuria/Mangolia/Tibet
·         Permanently at war
o   “warfare of limited aims between combatants who are unable to destroy one another, have no material cause for fighting, and are not divided by any genuine ideological difference” (186).
·         Few people actually fighting, few casualties
·         Different motives are now dominant that used to be mostly insignificant (186)
·         One superstate can’t win b/c all too evenly matched
o   Huge amount of land
o   Nothing to fight over: no need for markets b/c all have self-contained economies
§  1/5 of world population in middle no-mans-land + N. ice cap= labor force they fight over-->changes in who nation is “fighting”
·         Essentially slaves
o   Just borders fluctuate w/ fighting
·         War is so pointless--> laborers near Equator: “whatever they produce is used for purposes of war, and the object of waging a war is always to be in a better position to wage another war” (188)
o   Structure of world society based on war
o   Primary purpose of war= “use up the products of the machine without raising the general standard of living” (188)
§  Surplus of consumption goods in industrial society
·         Science + technology stopped developing b/c 1) wars/revolutions + 2) strict society not conducive to independent thinking
·         Machine = potential to decrease human inequality (no need for it)
o   Destroy hierarchal society
o   People normally “stupefied by poverty” would become literate, realize privileged minority = pointless, and get rid of it (190)
·         Needed to keep people poor--> restrict output of goods?--> that would make military weak--> continuous warfare = solution
o   “War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent” (191)
o   Ex. Floating Fortresses--> waste of efforts
·          Needs of population underestimated
o   Even privileged close to not having enough-->small privileges increases distinction b/w groups (Inner Party > Outer Party > proles)
·         War also provides emotional basis for hierarchal society
o   Morale of Party--> focus on war mentality
o   Esp. Inner Party--> knows some information is untrue, but doublethink prevents them from actually knowing they know it--> believe they will win
·         No more “science” in Newspeak--> closest thing is weapons development
·         2 aims of Party: 1) conquer earth 2) no more independent thought
·         2 problems of Party: 1) how to discover what people are thinking 2) “how to kill several hundred million people in a few seconds without giving warning beforehand” (193)
o   Pg. 194 descriptions of experiments
·         Post-atomic world--> bombs stored up but no longer dropped on each other
·         All 3 superstates following same strategy: circle rival state w/ bases, pretend to be friends, move bombs to strategic locations, blow them up, pretend to be friends w/ remaining power--> this won’t ever work
·         Want to keep “cultural integrity” (196)--> if one power conquers land in another superstate, the current population would have to be destroyed or assimilated
o   No contact with foreigners allowed--> people would realize the similarities, the lies--> breakdown of control
·         All 3 superstates have same philosophies
o   Ingsoc (Oceania), Neo-Bolshevism (Eurasia), Obliteration of the Self/Death-worship (Eastasia)
o   Convoluted reasoning behind conflict v. trying not to actually conquer each other pg. 197
·         In past, war had to end--> win/loss had consequence--> need to learn from past
o   “War was a sure safeguard of sanity” (198)--> ruling class had to be responsible
o   Now that it is continuous, efficiency = unnecessary
·         People have no contact w/ outside world or past, rulers = absolute--> what is reality?
·         “The war is waged by each ruling group against its own subjects, and the object of war is not to make or prevent conquests of territory, but to keep the structures of society intact” (199)
·         Constant war = same as 3 superstates agreeing to live in permanent peace w/in own boundaries--> still self-contained universe w/out external danger--> War is Peace

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

·         3 groups, always same goals-->High: remain where they are; Middle: change place with High; Low: create equality
o   Power shifts: Middle enlist Low and take power, but then Low still at bottom, Middle = new High-->never closer to equality
o   High: doctrine always was need for hierarchy
o   Middle: “freedom” and “justice,” “equality” that became tyranny…
·         New movements (like Ingsoc) = last overthrow and permanent High
·         Now that human equality was possible with machines, equality = real potential danger
o   “The earthly paradise had been discredited at the exact moment when it became realizable” (204)
·         New aristocracy = bureaucrats, scientists, trade-union organizers, teachers, politicians, etc. (pg. 205 full list)
o   Compared to past rulers, “they were less avaricious, less tempted by luxury, hungrier for pure power, and, above all, more conscious of what they were doing and more intent on crushing opposition” (205)
·         w/ technology, possible to enforce complete obedience + uniformity of opinion of all citizens
·         collectivism = only secure basis for oligarchy
o   collectively, Party owns everything
o   People thought that when capitalism overthrown, there would have to be Socialism--> this allowed for Party to easily get control
·         Ruling group falls from power if: 1) conquered from outside, 2) governs poorly and masses revolt, 3) allows strong Middle to develop, 4) loses self-confidence and willingness to govern
o   1--> no longer issue w/ permanent war
o   2--> w/out standards of comparison, masses don’t realize they are oppressed
o   3+4--> only potential problem: has to do w/ education
·         Structure--> not hereditary: exam at age 16, not divided by race
o   Big Brother = apex --> easier for people to focus feelings on one individual
o   Inner Party = brain (2% population)
o   Outer Party = hands
o   Proles (85%)
·         Rulers held together by common doctrine
·         Ambitious Outer Party allowed to rise--> now harmless; ambitious proles = killed
·         Old socialism: assumption that “what is not hereditary cannot be permanent” (209)--> this isn’t true--> ruling power doesn’t care WHO rules, just that their structure rules
·         Goal: don’t let anyone figure out that this is the way society works
o   Proles: doesn’t matter what they think b/c uneducated, no intellect
o   Party members: Thought Police control
§  No law in Oceania--> specific thoughts aren’t forbidden, but people who potentially have these thoughts are wiped out
§  Have to have correct beliefs without understanding them because otherwise they would realize the contradictions of Ingsoc
§  Children trained not to think (doublethink, crimestop, backwhite)
·         Discontent w/ life dissipated w/ Two Minutes Hate
·         Crimestop: act of stopping short any thought that could lead to a dangerous thought; “protective stupidity” (212) except one has complete control over his mind to make himself stupid
·         Blackwhite: 2 meanings
o   Toward enemy: contradiction of plain facts (bad)
o   Toward Party member: loyalty to whatever Party says, believing and knowing that what they say is and always has been true
·         Continuous alteration of past
o   Ensures people have no standard of comparison
o   Safeguard infallibility of Party--> must always be right
o   New version IS the past
o   Remember that an event happened, and then forget that you tampered with memory--> reality control aka doublethink (214)
·         Doublethink: “power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them” (214)
o   Allows history to be altered
o   In past, oligarchies fell because of unconsciousness or consciousness--> now system where both occur simultaneously
§  Secret to ruling: believe one is infallible w/ power to learn from past mistakes (215)
o   “the greater the understanding, the greater the delusion: the more intelligent, the less sane” (215)
§  Ex. war hysteria of Inner Party members
·         EVERYTHING IS A CONTRADICTION
o   Ex. Party member uniform = manual workers’ clothing (overalls)
o   To prevent equality, “the prevailing mental condition must be controlled insanity” (216)
§  “Sanity is not statistical” (218). Oh, Winston.