The
play-within-a-play in Act 3 Scene 2 gives the audience some insight into how
Hamlet interprets his father’s death and the events that have since unfolded. When
reading the play, it is important to keep in mind the intended audience:
Claudius and Gertrude. Hamlet is trying to elicit a strong response from
Claudius, so he obviously will try to emphasize the moral reprehensibility of
the king’s murder in the play. However, he also places a large focus on the
queen’s knowledge and opinions. The play begins with an interaction between the
king and queen in which they express their joy and love for each other. Unlike Hamlet,
this play follows the typical form of a tragedy in which the epitome of joy
sets the standard from which the characters will fall. The king says that it
has been thirty years “Since love our hearts and Hymen did our hands / Unite
commutual in most sacred bands” (3.2.180-1). Before his father’s death, Hamlet
seems to have thought his parents’ love came across as infinite and true. Their
marriage, Hamlet believes, was sacred. However, knowing what he knows now,
Hamlet inserts in the king’s lines, “The world is not for aye, nor ‘tis not
strange / That even our loves should with our fortunes change; / For ‘tis a
question left us yet to prove / Whether love lead fortune or else fortune love”
(3.2.223-6). The king suggests that if the queen’s luck were to change, she may
not love him as she does now. Essentially, he insinuates that if he were to
die, the queen may retract her love in order to improve her fate. The queen
refutes his claim, swearing, “Both here and hence pursue me lasting strife, /
If, once a widow, ever I be a wife” (3.2.245-6). Although not absolving her of
blame, Hamlet does seem to concede that Gertrude may not have intended to
betray old Hamlet before his death. However, Hamlet adds in her vow to never
marry if her husband dies, or else she will be pursued by “lasting strife.”
Hamlet may believe that Gertrude did not plan to marry Claudius before old
Hamlet died, but he also believes that she must pay the consequence for her
actions. Whether or not Hamlet’s interpretations of his parents’ attitudes are
correct, his representation of their attitudes succeeds in eliciting strong
responses from Claudius and possibly Gertrude.
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Saturday, March 9, 2013
Hamlet #4
How Everyone in Hamlet Would Benefit From a Family Chat
Lack
of communication and honesty threatens to continue causing problems for Hamlet
and those around him. Rather than make assumptions about what others are
thinking, each character should take it upon himself to directly address the issues
at hand. For instance, Claudius and Gertrude should perhaps take initiative
with Hamlet and explain their actions. The King seems to display profound concern
for Hamlet when he asks Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to essentially spy on him,
commenting, “What should it be, / More than his father’s death, that thus hath
put him / So much from th’ understanding of himself / I cannot dream of”
(2.2.7-10). Perhaps if the King had put a little more thought into the
situation, he may have realized that his nephew-son feels a little confused and
angry about the relationship between his “uncle-father and aunt-mother” (2.2.399).
Hamlet is bound to make assumptions (as he already has), and if those
assumptions lead him to believe that Claudius murdered his father (which they
have), then everyone may benefit from some clarification about the events
leading to King Hamlet’s death. Even if Claudius did murder Hamlet’s father,
admitting the truth now will save him from the repercussions of allowing the idea
to fester and twist itself in Hamlet’s mind. At the same time, Hamlet also needs
to take on some responsibility and approach Claudius with his concerns. Acting crazy
has thus far served no other purpose than to convince Polonius that Hamlet is madly
in love with Ophelia. Through his deception, Hamlet is perpetuating the spread
of false interpretations of his actions which is ironic given his supposed
contempt for fake appearances. Indeed, Hamlet is disgusted with himself when he
realizes that the actor conveyed deeper emotions than he has been able to
express in response to his father’s supposed murder. Rather than try to
directly address the problem, however, Hamlet decides to “have these players /
Play something like the murder of [his] father / Before [his] uncle”
(2.2.623-5). He believes that observing his uncle at the play will provide more
conclusive evidence than just the ghost who may, Hamlet admits, be a devil
playing on his emotions. Unfortunately, appearances can be deceiving, so Hamlet’s
plan may result in another misunderstanding. Only honesty and communication can
help avoid tragedy.
An example of a heart-to-heart
chat circumventing some problems:
“Hey Hamlet, you seem to be
acting a bit crazy lately. Is there anything particularly bothering you that I
can help clear up?”
“Actually uncle-king-dad, there
is. See, the ghost of my father came and told me that you poisoned him, stole
his wife, and took the throne. It’s been bothering me a bit lately.”
“Well Hamlet, I must admit that
this is an unforeseen problem. I wasn’t banking on Hamlet coming back from the
grave. However, the answer is yes, I did in fact murder your dad. I understand
that you are probably a bit angry right now.”
“Yeah, I’m pretty upset.
However, I appreciate your honesty. Now I know that if I kill you, I won’t find
out later that there was some miscommunication.”
“Yes. However, you should also
consider whether the ghost was your dead father or the devil. It may make a
difference to you if you are seeking to avoid eternal damnation.”
“That’s a good point. Thanks, I’ll
keep that in mind.”
“No problem. I think these chats
are good for us. Provided that you decide not to murder me anytime soon, I
think we should make this a regular thing.”
Unfortunately, this would not
make for a good Shakespearean tragedy.
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
Sound & Sense chp. 14 Poem
Please Let Me Go
I sense the darkness seeping through my lids
As black as night, and yet I feel no chill;
Though yearning for the end, my heart forbids
To cease its laboring thrums and just be still.
The misty tendrils of my earthy ties
May seek to catch me, but their fingers slip;
My ears, now deaf, will fail to hear their cries
As, gently, I begin to break their grip.
The warmth, the light, the glowing beckon me
And lift the burden that so long I held;
Without the pressure all my worries flee:
I find but peace where once my fears had dwelled.
Do you deny my right to leave you so?
I know that it is hard, but I must go .
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
College Poem
Time Moves On, And So Must You
I look at
you, and all I see
Are bright
eyes squinted in determination,
Shirley
Temple curls bouncing as you walk,
Hands on
your hips, pink cowboy boots on your feet.
Eavesdropping
on adult conversations
Before you
could even read
And adding
in your own commentary—
There was
never a silent moment in the house
Living with
high-pitched Halie.
I miss the
shows you put on in the living room,
Singing and
dancing, your brothers dressed up too,
Such an
imagination in that head of yours.
You’d
memorize the books we read
And “read”
them back to me every night—
“One berry, two berry, pick me a
blueberry…”
“‘No, no’ you say, ‘that isn’t right,
pigs say oink all day and night’…”
“And roared their terrible roars,
and gnashed their terrible teeth…”
I still know
them by heart, too.
I look at
you, and all I see
Is the
little seventh grader
With a huge
backpack, half as big as her,
That I’d
have to carry to the bus stop every morning.
I didn’t
mind getting up early to walk with you.
Those were
the days when I still drove the carpool to swim practice,
And your
friends would call me “Mr. Olson.”
You’d ask me
to read over your essays,
And I knew that
someday you’d be a better writer than I was,
But it hadn’t
happened quite yet.
I’d make you
eggs for breakfast,
And we’d watch
the news, just you and me.
I’d drive
you to the bus stop if the temperature dropped below 15 degrees.
You needed
me.
I look at
you, and I can’t see
How I’m
going to fill the hour before bed
That I set
aside for the inevitable, “Hey dad, can I talk to you for just a sec?”
The house
will seem so quiet
Without your
greeting each time someone passes through a room.
I’ll have to
remember to lock the door
And shut out
the lights, now that you won’t be the last one to bed.
The cat
might start sleeping with me now.
I’ve been
grasping onto the last few “Good night Dad, love you”s
Because I’ve
heard them every night for eighteen years
And I don’t want
to give them up.
I look at
you, and I can finally see
The confident,
independent young woman
Ready to
take on the world.
I know you’ll
find the right path,
Or maybe
even forge a new one.
Trust your
instincts, find your rhythm,
And just go
with it.
Sunday, March 3, 2013
Hamlet #2
Like
Claudius, Polonius imparts advice unto his son, but Laertes is much more
receptive than Hamlet. When Polonius arrives, Laertes is pleased to see him: “A
double blessing is a double grace. / Occasion smiles upon a second leave”
(1.3.58-9). Laertes clearly values his father and respects whatever his father
tells him. Hamlet, in contrast, gives a snarky response when the king refers to
Hamlet as his son: “A little more than kin and less than kind” (1.2.67). Hamlet
does not consider Claudius to be his father, and he refuses to speak civilly to
him. Perhaps part of the disparity between these two relationships can be
attributed to the respect each father gives his son. When advising Hamlet,
Claudius does not seem to hold Hamlet in high esteem. Although he initially
tries to somewhat praise Hamlet for his “sweet and commendable” nature that allows
him to mourn his father’s death, Claudius quickly begins to fault Hamlet for
lacking reason and distorting normal mourning (1.2.90). He calls Hamlet’s
excessive mourning “a fault to haven, / a fault against the dead, a fault to
nature” (1.2.105-6). By criticizing Hamlet, Claudius strains the already
precarious relationship between the two of them.
In
contrast, Polonius genuinely seems to care about his son when he offers advice.
He has Laertes’ best interest at heart when he says, for instance, “Neither a
borrower nor a lender be, / For loan oft loses both itself and friend”
(1.3.81-2). Polonius wants to help Laertes make good decisions, but he does not
force his opinions on him as Claudius does to Hamlet. Polonius’ final piece of
advice is “to thine own self be true” (1.3.84). Hamlet tries to be true to his
emotions and Claudius criticizes him for it whereas Polonius encourages self-honesty
in Laertes. Polonius and Laertes seem to have a much more stable relationship
based on a shared respect that Hamlet and Claudius lack.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)