Wednesday, October 24, 2012

1984 #9



WAR IS PEACE.

3 superstates


o   Eurasia--> Russia absorbed Europe --> now N. part of Europe/Asia landmass, Portugal to Bering Strait
o   Oceania--> USA absorbed British Empire -->now Americas, Atlantic Islands (incl British Isles), Australia, S. Africa
o   Eastasia--> 10 yrs fighting --> now China, countries S., Japanese islands, portion of Manchuria/Mangolia/Tibet
·         Permanently at war
o   “warfare of limited aims between combatants who are unable to destroy one another, have no material cause for fighting, and are not divided by any genuine ideological difference” (186).
·         Few people actually fighting, few casualties
·         Different motives are now dominant that used to be mostly insignificant (186)
·         One superstate can’t win b/c all too evenly matched
o   Huge amount of land
o   Nothing to fight over: no need for markets b/c all have self-contained economies
§  1/5 of world population in middle no-mans-land + N. ice cap= labor force they fight over-->changes in who nation is “fighting”
·         Essentially slaves
o   Just borders fluctuate w/ fighting
·         War is so pointless--> laborers near Equator: “whatever they produce is used for purposes of war, and the object of waging a war is always to be in a better position to wage another war” (188)
o   Structure of world society based on war
o   Primary purpose of war= “use up the products of the machine without raising the general standard of living” (188)
§  Surplus of consumption goods in industrial society
·         Science + technology stopped developing b/c 1) wars/revolutions + 2) strict society not conducive to independent thinking
·         Machine = potential to decrease human inequality (no need for it)
o   Destroy hierarchal society
o   People normally “stupefied by poverty” would become literate, realize privileged minority = pointless, and get rid of it (190)
·         Needed to keep people poor--> restrict output of goods?--> that would make military weak--> continuous warfare = solution
o   “War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent” (191)
o   Ex. Floating Fortresses--> waste of efforts
·          Needs of population underestimated
o   Even privileged close to not having enough-->small privileges increases distinction b/w groups (Inner Party > Outer Party > proles)
·         War also provides emotional basis for hierarchal society
o   Morale of Party--> focus on war mentality
o   Esp. Inner Party--> knows some information is untrue, but doublethink prevents them from actually knowing they know it--> believe they will win
·         No more “science” in Newspeak--> closest thing is weapons development
·         2 aims of Party: 1) conquer earth 2) no more independent thought
·         2 problems of Party: 1) how to discover what people are thinking 2) “how to kill several hundred million people in a few seconds without giving warning beforehand” (193)
o   Pg. 194 descriptions of experiments
·         Post-atomic world--> bombs stored up but no longer dropped on each other
·         All 3 superstates following same strategy: circle rival state w/ bases, pretend to be friends, move bombs to strategic locations, blow them up, pretend to be friends w/ remaining power--> this won’t ever work
·         Want to keep “cultural integrity” (196)--> if one power conquers land in another superstate, the current population would have to be destroyed or assimilated
o   No contact with foreigners allowed--> people would realize the similarities, the lies--> breakdown of control
·         All 3 superstates have same philosophies
o   Ingsoc (Oceania), Neo-Bolshevism (Eurasia), Obliteration of the Self/Death-worship (Eastasia)
o   Convoluted reasoning behind conflict v. trying not to actually conquer each other pg. 197
·         In past, war had to end--> win/loss had consequence--> need to learn from past
o   “War was a sure safeguard of sanity” (198)--> ruling class had to be responsible
o   Now that it is continuous, efficiency = unnecessary
·         People have no contact w/ outside world or past, rulers = absolute--> what is reality?
·         “The war is waged by each ruling group against its own subjects, and the object of war is not to make or prevent conquests of territory, but to keep the structures of society intact” (199)
·         Constant war = same as 3 superstates agreeing to live in permanent peace w/in own boundaries--> still self-contained universe w/out external danger--> War is Peace

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

·         3 groups, always same goals-->High: remain where they are; Middle: change place with High; Low: create equality
o   Power shifts: Middle enlist Low and take power, but then Low still at bottom, Middle = new High-->never closer to equality
o   High: doctrine always was need for hierarchy
o   Middle: “freedom” and “justice,” “equality” that became tyranny…
·         New movements (like Ingsoc) = last overthrow and permanent High
·         Now that human equality was possible with machines, equality = real potential danger
o   “The earthly paradise had been discredited at the exact moment when it became realizable” (204)
·         New aristocracy = bureaucrats, scientists, trade-union organizers, teachers, politicians, etc. (pg. 205 full list)
o   Compared to past rulers, “they were less avaricious, less tempted by luxury, hungrier for pure power, and, above all, more conscious of what they were doing and more intent on crushing opposition” (205)
·         w/ technology, possible to enforce complete obedience + uniformity of opinion of all citizens
·         collectivism = only secure basis for oligarchy
o   collectively, Party owns everything
o   People thought that when capitalism overthrown, there would have to be Socialism--> this allowed for Party to easily get control
·         Ruling group falls from power if: 1) conquered from outside, 2) governs poorly and masses revolt, 3) allows strong Middle to develop, 4) loses self-confidence and willingness to govern
o   1--> no longer issue w/ permanent war
o   2--> w/out standards of comparison, masses don’t realize they are oppressed
o   3+4--> only potential problem: has to do w/ education
·         Structure--> not hereditary: exam at age 16, not divided by race
o   Big Brother = apex --> easier for people to focus feelings on one individual
o   Inner Party = brain (2% population)
o   Outer Party = hands
o   Proles (85%)
·         Rulers held together by common doctrine
·         Ambitious Outer Party allowed to rise--> now harmless; ambitious proles = killed
·         Old socialism: assumption that “what is not hereditary cannot be permanent” (209)--> this isn’t true--> ruling power doesn’t care WHO rules, just that their structure rules
·         Goal: don’t let anyone figure out that this is the way society works
o   Proles: doesn’t matter what they think b/c uneducated, no intellect
o   Party members: Thought Police control
§  No law in Oceania--> specific thoughts aren’t forbidden, but people who potentially have these thoughts are wiped out
§  Have to have correct beliefs without understanding them because otherwise they would realize the contradictions of Ingsoc
§  Children trained not to think (doublethink, crimestop, backwhite)
·         Discontent w/ life dissipated w/ Two Minutes Hate
·         Crimestop: act of stopping short any thought that could lead to a dangerous thought; “protective stupidity” (212) except one has complete control over his mind to make himself stupid
·         Blackwhite: 2 meanings
o   Toward enemy: contradiction of plain facts (bad)
o   Toward Party member: loyalty to whatever Party says, believing and knowing that what they say is and always has been true
·         Continuous alteration of past
o   Ensures people have no standard of comparison
o   Safeguard infallibility of Party--> must always be right
o   New version IS the past
o   Remember that an event happened, and then forget that you tampered with memory--> reality control aka doublethink (214)
·         Doublethink: “power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them” (214)
o   Allows history to be altered
o   In past, oligarchies fell because of unconsciousness or consciousness--> now system where both occur simultaneously
§  Secret to ruling: believe one is infallible w/ power to learn from past mistakes (215)
o   “the greater the understanding, the greater the delusion: the more intelligent, the less sane” (215)
§  Ex. war hysteria of Inner Party members
·         EVERYTHING IS A CONTRADICTION
o   Ex. Party member uniform = manual workers’ clothing (overalls)
o   To prevent equality, “the prevailing mental condition must be controlled insanity” (216)
§  “Sanity is not statistical” (218). Oh, Winston.  

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

1984 #3



            By systematically reducing available vocabulary in the world of 1984, Orwell demonstrates the role of language in the thought process. Winston’s acquaintance Syme describes the benefits of cutting down the English language. He believes that most adjectives and verbs are superfluous, and therefore a single word should be chosen to convey an idea. The chosen words are also straightforward with a singular meaning, devoid of connotative significance. Words that encompass abstract ideas that do not coincide with Party philosophy are eliminated altogether. Syme reveals, “In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it” (Orwell 52). Most people think in words, especially when considering abstract concepts. One cannot simply visualize democracy or freedom. Humans need something definitive in order to cement it in their minds. This human tendency to believe in the concrete is demonstrated by the population’s acceptance of Party lies. Since all contradictory records are destroyed, people do not refute any claims the Party makes. There is nothing else for the population to draw on, so what they are told must be true. When people can no longer draw on certain words, the ideas those words convey will also no longer exist. In essence, “[t]he Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect” (52). Once the government has eradicated the means for citizens to defy their ideals, to think of defying their ideals, or even to think of thinking of defying their ideals—namely, when the words to express heretical ideas cease to exist—the population will be completely under its control. Without the capacity to think freely, the population will be enslaved without realizing it. They will not, of course, be able to describe the fact that they are enslaved because the words will not be available to them. To the Party, everyone will be orthodox because in their minds “[o]rthodoxy means not thinking—not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconscious” (53). Since there will no longer be any thinking, all thinking will be orthodox. Rather, all lack of thinking will be orthodox. No one will truly understand anything because there is nothing to understand. This is a drastic change in human identity and development.

Sunday, October 14, 2012

1984 #1



Orwell uses contradictory language in 1984 to establish the illogical nature of a society functioning in the absence of truth and free will. The three slogans of the Party engraved into the Ministry of Truth are “WAR IS PEACE / FREEDOM IS SLAVERY / IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH” (Orwell 4). Based on our contemporary definitions of these words, these slogans make absolutely no sense. Peace is considered to be the absence of fighting and war. Slavery is defined as the removal of one’s freedom. Strength comes from knowledge, not ignorance. The reader, therefore, must consider the circumstances in which these statements could be true. How far must a society fall for these ideals to be corrupted in such a way? Perhaps war brings peace within a country when citizens are turning against each other. If internal discontent is tearing the country apart, an external conflict may be able to direct the focus of the nation on a single enemy. Orwell comments that Goldstein “was an object more constant than either Eurasia or Eastasia, since when Oceania was at war with one of these powers it was generally at peace with the other” (13). The Ingsoc government seems to constantly direct the population’s attention at some external foe. Along with constantly reminding the country of Goldstein’s traitorous nature, the government also ensures that the country is fighting some other nation. People are less likely to question and attack their own government when another nation poses a greater threat. Along the same lines, it can be argued that a government is stronger when its people are ignorant, depending on the type of government that the nation is trying to establish. When people are unaware of other ways of life, they accept their circumstances. Whether or not they are satisfied with their lives, they do not consider any other way to live. By monitoring all communication among its citizens, the Ingsoc government prevents criticism and alternate ideologies from spreading. The nation gains strength from the collective ignorance of its citizens. The Thought Police are an instrument for weeding out thoughts that contradict the collective philosophy of Ingsoc. People are controlled by the awareness that they are constantly being watched. They do not have freedom over their thoughts; they are virtually enslaved because they cannot decide anything for themselves. However, theoretically an entire nation cannot be enslaved. Thus, one must conclude that they are all free. After all, “FREEDOM IS SLAVERY.” Orwell establishes a society that does not coincide with our beliefs yet seems to be based off of them, showing how ideals can be twisted depending on the circumstances.  

Sunday, October 7, 2012

Heart of Darkness #5


          The ambiguity of Kurtz’s last words leaves the meaning of his final message open to interpretation by the reader. With his final breath, Kurtz cries out, “The horror! The horror!” (Conrad 154). Kurtz has been established as an eloquent and powerful speaker. Conrad often uses synecdoche, referring to Kurtz as his voice; it is Kurtz’s primary source of persuasion and control. Thus, the reader can assume that these last words are specifically chosen to convey a certain message. One explanation is that Kurtz has just experienced a moment of catharsis and realizes that his actions in Africa have been morally unjust. Kurtz is a very straightforward person, and Marlow admires this about him. He has been very matter-of-fact about what he has been doing in the Congo; he has taken advantage of the natives and taken an extensive amount of ivory by unethical means. He has severed heads stuck on posts surrounding his shack. Kurtz has justified everything he has done up until this point, but perhaps at this final moment it sinks in that he has not been a just and model human being. Marlow describes Kurtz’s “expression of somber pride, of ruthless power, of craven terror—of an intense and hopeless despair” (Conrad 153). Enlightened by his imminent death, he may be reliving his choices in life and realizing how and where he went wrong. On the other hand, Kurtz could be referring to his own death as the “horror.” Kurtz has considered himself above everyone else in the past, and he still may feel this way. Kurtz may see his death as a “horror” for the rest of humanity. He presents himself to the natives as one equivalent to a god, and even the harlequin follows him with disciple-like devotion. The isolation of the Congo has inflated his self-perception, and perhaps he thinks of himself as almost a divine being. He speaks and writes with such persuasion and self-assurance that people believe him. Marlow admits to being persuaded by Kurtz’s paper about how to treat native people, and Kurtz’s Intended tells how powerful his voice was. Kurtz believed in the ideas he shared with the world, and he may think that the world will suffer without them. Another possibility is that Kurtz is upset at the circumstances of his death, namely, the fact that he is not dying in a position of power. He is leaving the Congo, where he had complete control, against his will. He has lost his followers and his land, and now even his life is being wrested from his grasp. Since Kurtz lives for control, he really has nothing else to live for. Conrad does not clarify the meaning of this message, so there is no way to fully understand Kurtz or the corruption of power he represents.

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Heart of Darkness #4



Conrad describes Kurtz from multiple perspectives before the audience actually meets him. This highlights certain aspects of his character so that the reader has some identity to look for and grasp onto when Kurtz is finally revealed. On the ship, Marlow flashes forward in his story to describe Kurtz. Kurtz is very possessive; he feels that all of the land and all of the ivory are entitled to him. However, Marlow reveals that Kurtz “was very little more than a voice” (Conrad 125). His voice clearly carries an extensive amount of power, for Kurtz has been extremely successful in raiding the land for ivory. He is also given the task of writing a report for the International Society for the Suppression of Savage Customs. In his report, Kurtz explains that whites “must necessarily appear to them [savages] in the nature of supernatural beings” (Conrad 127). The eloquence of Kurtz’s writing helps him to be very persuasive, and even Marlow admits that the words convince him of Kurtz’s argument. Kurtz seems to view himself as a god with the power and right to control the African people. This may have partially been caused by his isolation in the jungle; he is given the opportunity to establish his own role there. After the reader receives this information, the story returns to Marlow on the boat, and the ship reaches the inner station. However, Kurtz is not immediately revealed at the heart of the jungle; another character introduces the reader to him first. When the steamboat finally reaches the inner station, a strange man greets the ship. He is referred to as a “harlequin” dressed in brightly patched clothes. This man is completely and insensibly devoted to Kurtz. He remains in this isolated jungle to care for Kurtz even though Kurtz does not ask for nor seem to appreciate his help. In fact, Kurtz threatens to shoot the man when he does not give over his ivory. Still, the harlequin remains ever faithful to Kurtz; he is like a disciple. The man speaks of Kurtz with reverence, and he excuses any questionable deeds by proclaiming that Kurtz is not an “ordinary man” (Conrad 135). The harlequin tells Marlow, “You don’t talk with that man—you listen to him” (Conrad 132). This man confirms both Kurtz’s power with words and his godlike view of himself. Kurtz is able to control not only the African people but also the Europeans, such as the harlequin. He is gifted with eloquence, and he uses this gift to obtain power. The harlequin explains, “he came to them with thunder and lightning, you know—and they had never seen anything like it—and very terrible. He could be very terrible” (Conrad 135). The man recognizes that Kurtz can be “terrible,” yet it seems justified for the greater good that Kurtz appears to support. He is once again presented as a supreme being. Marlow seems repulsed with Kurtz as the man describes him, yet in his previous flashback he offers some explanations for Kurtz’s behaviors. The various interpretations of Kurtz show the reader that he is complex and not necessarily as evil as he seems. Somehow, Marlow will develop some greater understanding of Kurtz’s character.